ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Occupational health risk perceptions and determinants: knowledge and attitude of sanitary workers in public hospitals of Ethiopia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational health risks (OHRs) perception refer to an individual's subjective assessment of the likelihood and severity of potential health hazards within their workplace, which are influenced by their knowledge and attitude. The OHRs perceptions of sanitary workers (SWs) in Ethiopia have not yet been well studied. Therefore, this study aims to assess the knowledge and attitude of SWs about OHR perceptions and their determinants in public hospitals of eastern Ethiopia. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 809 SWs, which comprised face-to-face interviews. Knowledge items were measured by [YES/NO] and then categorized as "good" if they scored 16-20 points; "fair" if 10-15 points; and "poor" if < 10 points. On the other hand, attitude items were measured on Likert scales [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5)] and classified as level 1: unfavorable; level 2: neutral; and level 3: favorable. Stata 17MP version was used for data analysis. The univariate analysis was applied for frequency, prevalence, media, and mean. Multilevel ordinal logistic regression was conducted for the predictions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the correlations between level of knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs perceptions as well as with their predictors. Result: This study found that the poor level of knowledge of and unfavorable attitude toward OHRs among SWs were 67.35 and 42.66%, respectively. The difference in knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs perceptions of SWs between hospitals was 19.34 and 39.55%, respectively. The final model showed that the variables trained on occupational health and safety [OHS] (AOR: 4.90; 3.10, 7.75), satisfied with job (AOR: 1.88; 1.10, 3.75), and satisfied with environment (AOR: 2.57; 1.09, 6.05) were significantly associated with higher knowledge levels about OHRs. However, SWs who were satisfied with environment (AOR: 2.67; 1.03, 6.92) and who follow good infection prevention and control (IPC) practice (AOR: 20.43; 15, 35.84) were significantly associated with a high level of attitude toward OHRs. SEM results showed that OHS training ( Conclusion: This study concluded that the majority of SWs had inadequate knowledge about and negative attitude toward OHRs perceptions. The following variables played the most significant role in predicting the SWs' knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs: OHS training, job and environmental satisfaction, safety measures, and job stress, which could be considered for further interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.