Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416620›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Prognostic significance of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin-based biomarker in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Susanna Hilda Hutajulu, Yufi Kartika Astari, Meita Ucche, Nyoman Kertia, Yanri Wijayanti Subronto, Dewi Kartikawati Paramita, Lina Choridah, Ericko Ekaputra, Irianiwati Widodo, Suwardjo Suwardjo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Susanna Hilda HutajuluDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Yufi Kartika AstariDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Meita UccheStudy Program of Subspecialty, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Nyoman KertiaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Yanri Wijayanti SubrontoDivision of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Dewi Kartikawati ParamitaDepartment of Histology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Lina ChoridahDivision of Radiodiagnosis, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Ericko EkaputraDivision of Radiotherapy, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Irianiwati WidodoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Suwardjo SuwardjoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Mardiah Suci HardiantiDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Kartika Widayati Taroeno-HariadiDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Ibnu PurwantoDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.
Johan KurniandaDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer patients with similar clinicopathologic characteristics may experience varied outcomes. This urges an increased effort to investigate other prognostic factors. C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is an inflammatory and nutritional biomarker that has been well studied and reported to have an impact on the survival of patients with diverse types of cancer, but limitedly in breast cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of CAR in local patients with breast cancer. Methods: This study included 202 stage I-IV breast cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. We calculated inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers including CAR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) before treatment. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to analyze the prognostic role of clinicopathologic factors and biomarkers on disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median follow-up period was 46 months (1-77 months). The 3-year DFS and 3-year OS in patients with high CAR (CAR > 1.5) were significantly lower than those with low CAR (CAR ≤ 1.5) (47.0% Conclusion: Besides age, stage, and molecular subtypes that have been widely observed to have impact on the survival of breast cancer patients, CAR was demonstrated as a promising prognostic marker in our local patients. A high CAR at diagnosis was associated with unfavorable DFS and OS, which can aid in identifying patients at risk and guide personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsC-Reactive ProteinSerum AlbuminAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinSerum AlbuminAlbuminBreast neoplasmsC-reactive proteinMortalitySurvival

Identifiers

PMID40416620
PMCPMC12103165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.