Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416590›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025

A Landscape of Recent Literature on the Predictors of Success and Failure in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Yasser Alshomrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasser AlshomraniDepartment of Orthopedics Umm al-Qura University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0493-5325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is a widely used surgical technique to address patellar instability. This procedure is influenced by several key factors, including patient-specific factors, anatomical considerations, graft selection, tunnel placement, tensioning, fixation methods, postoperative rehabilitation, and potential complications. Various graft options, including autografts and allografts, have been studied, with research indicating no significant differences in pain reduction, return to activity, or failure rates between the two. However, some studies suggest allografts may have a lower failure rate and recurrence of patellar instability compared to autografts. The precise placement of the femoral tunnel is essential for successful reconstruction. Ensuring that the graft is neither too tight nor too loose during fixation contributes significantly to the biomechanical stability of the knee. Different fixation methods, including suture anchors and interference screws, have been compared, with both providing reliable initial fixation strength. Postoperative rehabilitation is another crucial aspect, with studies showing that accelerated protocols can yield favorable outcomes without increasing the risk of recurrent instability. Complications such as recurrent dislocations, patellar fractures, and infections have been reported, with technical errors during surgery being a major contributing factor. A comprehensive approach, involving precise surgical technique and tailored rehabilitation protocols, is necessary to minimize complications and optimize long-term success.

Indexed as

FailureMedial patellofemoral ligamentPredictorsreconstructionSuccess

Identifiers

PMID40416590
PMCPMC12103297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.