ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Clinical Impact of the Early Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the clinical impact of early sacubitril/valsartan initiation on clinical outcomes and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and prescriptions for sacubitril/valsartan were identified from a multi-institutional database in Taiwan from 2016 to 2020. The patients were categorized as early users if they initiated sacubitril/valsartan within 6 months of the initial diagnosis, and late users if they initiated sacubitril/valsartan 6 months or more after the diagnosis. Clinical outcomes and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography were compared between the early and late users after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment. Results: Among the 410 enrolled patients, 188 were early users and 222 were late users. The early users were younger and had a lower LVEF, while the late users had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. After IPTW, the two groups had similar baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and heart failure hospitalization before and after IPTW. However, post-IPTW, the early user group had a lower risk of cumulative emergency department visits (hazard ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.99; p = 0.0353). Both groups demonstrated reverse remodeling, with an increase in LVEF from 28.7% to 45.3% in the early users, and from 28.9% to 40.1% in the late users, which was significantly more prominent in the early users (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In patients with newly-diagnosed HFrEF, the early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a lower risk of the cumulative number of emergency visits and a greater improvement in LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.