Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416548›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2025

Analyzing Medication Adherence Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Thi-Qar, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Adel Gassab Mohammed, Nassar Taha Yaseen, Dheyaa K AlWaeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adel Gassab MohammedDepartment of Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolism Division, University of Thi-Qar, College of Medicine, Thi-Qar Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolism Center (TDEMC), Thi-Qar Health Directorate, Nasiriyah, Thi-Qar, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9084-1038
Nassar Taha YaseenFaiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3686-0366
Dheyaa K AlWaeliDepartment of Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolism Division, University of Thi-Qar, College of Medicine, Thi-Qar Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolism Center (TDEMC), Thi-Qar Health Directorate, Nasiriyah, Thi-Qar, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-2205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigates the adherence levels to diabetes treatment among patients and explores the factors influencing adherence, glycemic control, and the occurrence of diabetes-related complications. A cross-sectional study involving 296 diabetes patients was conducted to evaluate their demographic and clinical profiles, treatment strategies, and adherence levels using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Statistical analyses identified variables affecting adherence and their relationships with glycemic control and complications. The study population comprised 56% men, with an average age of 49.4 years. Obesity was observed in 24.3% of participants, while the median disease duration was 5 years. The average HbA1c level was 8.4%. Microvascular complications were present in 48.6% of patients, and 18.2% experienced macrovascular complications. Most patients were prescribed oral antidiabetic medications (OAD), with 25% receiving insulin therapy. Adherence rates were suboptimal, with only 3.4% achieving good adherence, 30.4% moderate adherence, and 66.2% poor adherence. Men had higher rates of poor adherence compared to women (72.3% vs. 58.5%). Interestingly, adherence was better in patients with a longer disease duration and a higher body mass index (BMI). The study further examined adherence's impact on glycemic outcomes, finding that poor adherence strongly correlated with elevated HbA1c levels. Among individuals with HbA1c ≥ 7%, 70.5% exhibited poor adherence, whereas 40% of patients with good adherence still had suboptimal glycemic control. Conversely, among those with HbA1c < 7%, 24.5% demonstrated poor adherence compared to 40% with good adherence. Random blood sugar (RBS) levels were significantly higher in poorly adherent patients (237 mg/dL) versus those with good adherence (141 mg/dL). Although adherence was not statistically linked to complication prevalence, patients with reported adherence challenges were more prone to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Different treatment regimens were also analyzed, revealing that sulfonylureas (SUs) were associated with poor adherence (85%), while sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) showed better adherence rates (16.7%). Missed doses were strongly linked to poor glycemic outcomes but had a lesser impact on complication development. These findings underscore the need for individualized strategies to enhance adherence and optimize glycemic control, ultimately reducing diabetes-related complications.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsMedication AdherenceAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansIraqMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agentscross-sectional studyglycemic controlSouthern Iraqtreatment adherenceType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40416548
PMCPMC12101902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.