Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416539›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Bayesian Analysis of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients.

Jay Prakash, Khushboo Saran, Vivek Verma, Kunal Raj, Archana Kumari, Pradip K Bhattacharya, Shio Priye, Bram Rochwerg, Raj Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Author Response: Critical Appraisal of the Bayesian Application of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Score: Caution Against Overextension as a Mortality Predictor.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jay PrakashDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-3848
Khushboo SaranDepartment of Pathology, Gandhi Nagar Hospital, Central Coalfields Ltd, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-8445
Vivek VermaDepartment of Statistics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2537-4431
Kunal RajDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1084-6977
Archana KumariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-9280
Pradip K BhattacharyaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-385X
Shio PriyeDepartment of Superspeciality Anesthesia, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-5580
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-7061
Raj KumarDirector and Professor of Neurosurgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1902-2459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Malnutrition has a considerable influence on critically ill patients by increasing mortality and poorer clinical outcomes. The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score is commonly used to assess nutritional risk and predict death; however, its sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cut-off values differ between studies. This study uses a Bayesian approach to assess the accuracy of the mNUTRIC score in predicting mortality in critically ill patients. Patients and methods: A preplanned Bayesian analysis was performed using data from 31 cohort studies, which included 13,271 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The study investigated the mNUTRIC score's sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC). Subgroup analysis compared mortality rates at 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital time points, along with cut-off values (<5 vs ≥5). Bayesian modeling was performed using the rjags and brms packages in R version 3.2.1. These tools also facilitated the visualization of results, including posterior distributions, forest plots, and Fagan nomograms. Results: Bayesian analysis affirmed the mNUTRIC score's high discriminative capacity, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.80-0.88), specificity of 0.77 (95% CrI: 0.73-0.80), and AUC of 0.88 (95% CrI: 0.83-0.92). A cut-off of <5 resulted in higher sensitivity (0.83) and AUC (0.87), whereas ≥5 remained accurate but had somewhat lower sensitivity. The score consistently predicted 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: The Bayesian analysis validates the mNUTRIC score as a reliable predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. Its excellent diagnostic performance suggests its incorporation into ICU for early risk assessment and nutritional interventions. How to cite this article: Prakash J, Saran K, Verma V, Raj K, Kumari A, Bhattacharya PK,

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisCritically ill patientsIntensive care unit mortalityModified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill scoreNutritional risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40416539
PMCPMC12101984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.