ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025
Reproducibility of MRI-derived radiomic features in prostate cancer detection: a methodological approach.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to evaluate the reproducibility of these features and apply machine learning algorithms to predict cancer diagnosis. Material and methods: We analyzed magnetic resonance (MR) images from a cohort of 82 individuals, split between 41 prostate cancer patients and 41 healthy controls. A total of 215 radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted and ADC images using the Software Environment for Radiomic Analysis (SERA). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to assess the reproducibility of features, and Pearson's correlation was applied to remove redundant features. After feature selection, seven dimensionality reduction techniques, including principal component analysis (PCA), kernel PCA, linear discriminant analysis, and locally linear embedding, were applied to preprocess the radiomic features. Ten machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM), random forests, neural networks, logistic regression, and ensemble methods such as CatBoost and AdaBoost, were utilized to classify cancerous versus non-cancerous tissues. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy and AUC-ROC metrics. Results: The results showed that features with high reproducibility (ICC > 0.75) contributed significantly to the performance of machine learning models. SVM, neural networks, and logistic regression achieved the highest accuracy (0.88-0.9) and AUC (up to 0.93) when using features from the good and excellent reproducibility categories. PCA emerged as the most effective dimensionality reduction method, preserving the discriminative power of reproducible features across all models. Conclusion: The results indicate that radiomic feature extraction from MR images, combined with dimensionality reduction and machine learning algorithms, provides a robust approach for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.