Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416504›Full record

ReviewBME frontiers2025

A Systematic Review of Toxicity, Biodistribution, and Biosafety in Upconversion Nanomaterials: Critical Insights into Toxicity Mitigation Strategies and Future Directions for Safe Applications.

Imran Ahamed Khan, Ting Yu, Ming Yang, Jinliang Liu, Zhong Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BME frontiers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imran Ahamed KhanSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-3908
Ting YuSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Ming YangSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-4235
Jinliang LiuSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Fujian, Jinjiang, Fujian 362200, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are emerging as highly promising nanomaterials due to their exceptional optical properties, enabling diverse applications in biosensing, bioimaging, photodynamic therapy, and drug delivery. However, their potential toxicity should be comprehensively investigated for the safe utilization of UCNPs in several biomedical and environmental applications. This review systematically evaluates the current knowledge on UCNP toxicity from 2008 to 2024, focusing on key toxicological pathways, such as oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, inflammatory responses, and apoptosis/necrosis, alongside their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes and kinetics. Distinctively, this review introduces a bibliometric analysis of UCNP toxicity and biodistribution research, providing a quantitative assessment of publication trends, influential authors, leading institutions, funding agencies, and keyword occurrences. This approach offers a macroscopic perspective on the evolution and current landscape of UCNP safety research, a dimension largely unexplored in existing literature. Furthermore, the review combines mechanistic insights into UCNP toxicity with a critical evaluation of surface modifications, physicochemical properties, and administration routes, presenting a holistic framework for understanding UCNP biosafety. By combining bibliometric data with mechanistic insights, this review provides a data-driven perspective on UCNP-associated risks, actionable strategies for enhancing biosafety through surface engineering, and a forward-looking discussion on regulatory challenges and future directions for UCNP-based technologies. These findings bridge existing gaps in the literature and offer a comprehensive resource for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, facilitating the safe development and utilization of UCNP-based technologies while establishing robust safety guidelines to mitigate adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Identifiers

PMID40416504
PMCPMC12099058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.