ReviewSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2025
The Potential of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Therapeutic Tool Following a Stroke (Review).
Review in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EEG vs. Hybrid EEG-fNIRS BCI for FES Control in Healthy Subjects: A Blind Randomized Study and an Open Dataset.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement of novel technologies for the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients represents a significant challenge for a range of interdisciplinary fields. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an optical neuroimaging technique based on recording local hemodynamic changes at the cerebral cortex level. The technology is typically employed in post-stroke patients for diagnostic purposes, including the assessment of neuroplastic processes accompanying therapy, the study of hemispheric asymmetry, and the examination of functional brain networks. However, functional NIRS can also be used for therapeutic purposes, including the provision of biofeedback during rehabilitation tasks, as well as the navigation method during transcranial stimulation. The effectiveness of therapeutic NIRS application in stroke patients remains insufficiently studied, despite existing scientific evidence confirming its promising potential as a treatment method. The review examines the published literature on the therapeutic applications of NIRS after stroke, evaluating its potential role in the rehabilitation process. The paper describes NIRS features, advantages, and disadvantages, determining its position among other neuroimaging technologies; analyzes the findings of neurophysiological studies, which justified the clinical trials of NIRS technology; and evaluates the results of the studies on the therapeutic use of NIRS in post-stroke patients. Two potential applications of NIRS for therapeutic purposes following a stroke were suggested: the first was to provide real-time feedback during movement training (motor or ideomotor ones, including that in brain-computer interface circuits), and the second was to facilitate navigation during transcranial stimulation. Based on a comprehensive literature review, there were proposed and justified further research lines and development in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.