ArticleJournal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies2025
Validation of the Filipino Version of the Diabetes Distress Scale for Adult Patients with Diabetes seen at the Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Government Hospital in Quezon City, Philippines.
Article in Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Caring for persons with diabetes involves a holistic approach. Addressing diabetes distress is crucial to achieve optimal health outcomes for persons with diabetes. This study aims to validate a Filipino version of the diabetes distress scale (DDS). Methodology: We conducted forward and backward translations to construct a Filipino version from the validated English questionnaire. We performed statistical analysis to check internal consistency and validation and to correlate diabetes distress with glycemic control based on the subjects' HbA1c levels. Results: We included one hundred and seventy patients (170) seen at the Outpatient Diabetes Clinic in the analysis. Of the participants, 13 (7.6%) have Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), while the rest have Type 2 (T2DM). We found physician distress (PD) to be significantly associated with having T1DM. All domains in the Filipino DDS showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85. We used factor analysis to extract four factors similar to the original diabetes distress scale. We did not find any significant correlation between diabetes distress and HbA1c level. Conclusion: The Filipino DDS showed good internal reliability and had consistent results similar to the original diabetes distress scale. However, we did not find a significant correlation between diabetes-related distress and the HbA1c level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.