ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Redefining Liver Fibrosis Risk Assessment in Indians with Type 2 Diabetes: New FIB-4 Score Cutoff for Optimizing Sequential Assessment with Transient Elastography.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Bivariate Meta-Analysis of FIB-4 Cut-Offs to Rule Out Advanced Fibrosis in MASLD.International journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- The Need for Population-Specific Validation in MASLD Screening.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of transient elastography for liver fibrosis screening in Thai patients with diabetes mellitus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is strongly related to hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes. Clinically Significant Liver Fibrosis (CSLF) screening using FIB-4 score is mandated in all T2D patients. The existing FIB-4 cutoff of 1.3 is derived from Western studies and could differ for Indians. Hence, we aimed to determine the FIB-4 cutoff to rule out Transient Elastography (TE) proven CSLF among Indians with T2D. Methods: 551 individuals with T2D underwent laboratory tests for FIB-4 calculation and transient elastography (TE) to detect CSLF defined as Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) ≥ 8kPa. The Receiver Operative Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimum cutoff value of FIB4 to rule out CSLF. Results: 129 (23.4%) of 551 T2D patients in our cohort had CSLF. We found that a FIB-4 of 1.5 rules out CSLF with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of 82.9%, 79.9%, 55.7%, 93.8%, and 80.6%, respectively, compared with a FIB4 of 1.3 which has values of 91.5%, 67.3%, 46.1%, 96.2%, and 72.9%, respectively. Conclusion: A FIB-4 cutoff of 1.5 rather than 1.3 is suggested for Indian subjects with T2DM and needs to be validated in further large multicenter prospective studies, preferably with histopathology as the gold standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.