ArticleHRB open research2025
Nurses' usage of validated tools to assess for delirium in general acute care settings: A scoping review protocol.
Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' usage of validated tools to assess for delirium in general acute care settings: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Clinical Nursing Management of Adult Patients with Delirium in a Hospital Setting-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delirium is an acute, neuropsychiatric syndrome, characterized by an altered mental state. It often affects hospital in-patients and is associated with an increased risk of mortality, dementia, and functional decline. Delirium can be detected through the use of validated assessment tools, administered by nurses, and early detection is associated with improved outcomes for patients. However, validated tools are infrequently utilised and cases of delirium are frequently missed. A greater understanding of nurses' use of validated delirium assessment tools is needed in order to reduce the number of missed cases. Objectives: The aim of this scoping review is to identify how validated assessment tools are used by nurses in general acute care settings to assess for delirium and identify the barriers and enablers for said tools' use. Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The databases CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus will be searched using a search strategy. Grey literature will also be searched using Google Scholar and BASE. Results will be uploaded to Covidence where the sources will be screened for relevance. Data from relevant sources will be extracted using a data extraction tool. Results: The PRISMA-ScR flow diagram will present the results of the search. Results will be mapped descriptively and presented as both tabulated results and a narrative summary. Conclusion: This protocol outlines the structure of a scoping review that will analyse the existing literature surrounding nurses use of validated delirium assessment tools. This review aims to map the evidence of delirium assessment tool utilisation by nurses and identify any barriers to usage. This will support future researchers and policy makers in the improvement of delirium assessment in acute care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.