ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Congenital Melanocytic Nevus of the Nose: Clinical Experience and Reconstructive Approaches.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Congenital Melanocytic Nevus of the Nose: Clinical Experience and Reconstructive Approaches.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMNs) of the nose are uncommon. These nevi present an aesthetic reconstructive challenge. This study presented our experience in surgical management of the varying presentations of these lesions. Methods: Seventeen patients with medium and large nasal CMNs were operated on between the years 2010 and 2020. Children with small congenital nevi amenable to excision and primary closure were excluded from this study. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics, surgical management, and postoperative outcomes and complications. Medium-sized nasal nevi isolated to the upper two-thirds of the nose were reconstructed with serial excision, whereas lower third nevi were reconstructed with full-thickness skin grafts or composite grafts. Larger nevi, with an extension into an additional facial unit, were reconstructed with expanded flaps from the forehead or cheek regions. Results: Children with nevi isolated to the nose had between 1 and 3 procedures including serial excision, skin grafts, or composite grafts. Children with extensive facial CMNs had between 2 and 8 procedures (for treatment of the whole facial nevus). Two patients were reconstructed with expanded cheek flaps, 1 with an expanded forehead flap, and 2 with both. Reconstructions were achieved with minimal complication rates and good surgical outcomes. Conclusions: Congenital nevi of the nose present a reconstructive challenge. The authors developed a treatment algorithm with the aim of offering an optimal surgical management plan. Longer follow-up is still needed given many of the patients will reach mature facial growth in the near future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.