ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association between the skeletal muscle-to-visceral fat ratio and kidney stones: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between dynamic abdominal obesity (DAO) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (lower urinary tract symptoms): evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Association between skeletal muscle index and kidney stones in health screening populations: a single-center cross-sectional study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Association of the skeletal muscle mass-to-visceral fat area ratio with cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- BRI is an independent predictor of new-onset kidney stones in a non-diabetic population: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prior research has suggested links between skeletal muscle mass and visceral fat volume with kidney stone formation. However, the link between the skeletal muscle-to-visceral fat ratio (SVR) and kidney stone risk remains to be clarified. This study aims to explore the relationship between SVR and the risk of kidney stones, analyzing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods: The research encompassed 8,522 individuals from NHANES surveys from 2011 to 2018. Kidney stones were diagnosed through a standardized questionnaire, and SVR was calculated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Participants were grouped into quartiles based on their SVR. All data underwent weighting according to official guidelines. Logistic regression models assessed the correlation between SVR and kidney stone incidence, and subgroup analysis was employed to investigate its stability. Results: Among the participants, 675 individuals, representing 8.73%, received a diagnosis of kidney stones, with an average age of 39.29 years (±0.28). Findings indicate that lower SVR correlates with increased kidney stone risk. Within the comprehensively adjusted multivariate model, compared to the lowest SVR quartile, the second, third, and fourth quartiles demonstrated significantly reduced risks, with ORs of 0.63 (95% CI = 0.47-0.84), 0.57 (95% CI = 0.42-0.79), and 0.39 (95% CI = 0.25-0.61), respectively. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression models demonstrated a non-linear relationship between SVR and kidney stone risk. The subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant differences in weighted associations across subgroups (interaction Conclusion: The findings underscore that lower SVR correlates with increased kidney stone risk, a relationship that remains consistent across most demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.