Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416294›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Cost Analysis of Recurrent Emergency Department Visits Among Patients Aged 65 and Older: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Teoman Ersen, Özhan Özcan, Kıvanç Öncü, Servan Gokhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teoman ErsenDepartment of Emergency, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Sinop, TUR.
Özhan ÖzcanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, TUR.
Kıvanç ÖncüDepartment of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Sinop, TUR.
Servan GokhanDepartment of Emergency, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to analyze the costs of emergency department (ED) visits among patients aged 65 years and older, with a particular focus on the financial burden of recurrent admissions within a one-year period. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 143,909 ED visits recorded between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, at the Emergency Department of Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Data for patients aged 65 and older were extracted from the Hospital Information Management System. Cost data were based on the Social Security Institution billing system and converted into US dollars (USD) using the 2014 exchange rate. Patients were categorized by age, gender, diagnosis, and visit frequency. Nonparametric statistical tests were used due to the non-normal distribution of cost variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 21,458 (15.0%) ED visits were made by patients aged 65 and older. The median cost per visit in this group was $58.16. Costs increased with age: $42.90 for patients aged 65-74, $76.67 for those aged 75-84, and $96.42 for those aged ≥85 (Kruskal-Wallis H = 1,125.3, df = 2, p < 0.001). Among the 19,159 elderly patients who visited the ED, 1,951 (10.2%) had recurrent visits. Within this subgroup, internal medicine diagnoses were most common (1,345 visits, or 68.9%), followed by pulmonary (320, or 16.4%), cardiovascular (211, or 10.8%), and non-specific complaints (231, or 11.8%) as the leading causes. This diagnostic distribution differed significantly from that of single-visit patients (χ² = 42.7, df = 3, p < 0.001). Recurrence rates varied significantly by diagnostic category (χ² = 89.4, df = 5, p < 0.001): the highest recurrence was observed in patients with hematologic conditions (56/355, or 15.8%; adjusted OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.28-2.31), followed by psychiatric (8/57, or 14.0%; adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.99-2.12) and pulmonary diagnoses (320/2,358, or 13.6%; adjusted OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22-1.57), all above the overall recurrence rate of 10.2%. The median cost of the first ED visit was significantly higher in the recurrent group ($72.13) compared to the non-recurrent group ($59.76) (Mann-Whitney U = 14.2 × 10⁶, p < 0.001, r = 0.14). Among recurrent cases, the mean cost of the first visit ($101.84) exceeded the average cost of subsequent visits ($93.98) (Wilcoxon T = 2.4 × 10⁵, p < 0.001, r = 0.09). Conclusion Older patients generate disproportionately higher ED costs in Turkey, particularly those with recurrent visits and chronic conditions. These findings support the implementation of geriatric-focused emergency care models and preventive strategies to optimize resource utilization in aging populations.

Indexed as

cost analysisemergency carefrail elderlyhealthcare costshospital readmission

Identifiers

PMID40416294
PMCPMC12103731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.