ArticleCureus2025
Ultrasound Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Pediatrics: A Community Hospital Network Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Salivary C-Reactive Protein: A Non-Invasive Alternative to Serum CRP in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ultrasound has emerged as the preferred initial imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis in children, but most data supporting its use come from academic children's medical centers. The purpose of this investigation is to describe ultrasound utilization for diagnosing acute appendicitis in children at a large community hospital network. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study and chart review of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). The primary outcome of this study was the proportion of patients diagnosed with ultrasound as the sole imaging modality, presented as a population proportion with a 95% confidence interval. Results There were 450 patients included. The mean age was 10 years (range 3-17). Among the 450 patients, there were a total of 713 imaging studies. Only 213 (47.3%) patients had a single imaging test ordered during the ED encounter, and only 52 patients (11.6%) had an ultrasound during the encounter as the only imaging modality. The initial study ordered was a CT scan in 184 (40.9%), an ultrasound in 172 (38.2%), and an X-ray in 94 (20.9%). Sixty-two of 172 (36.0%) ultrasounds were positive for appendicitis. Of the 62 positive studies, 11 (17.7%) had a confirmatory CT scan. Conclusion In this community hospital network, patients had multiple imaging modalities ordered to confirm the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Less than half had an ultrasound ordered as the initial imaging modality, suggesting its use is not as widespread as academic data may indicate. Despite a positive diagnostic ultrasound, some patients went on to have a confirmatory CT scan, which provides further opportunity to improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.