ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Post-extraction Healing of Mandibular Third Molars: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealing of extraction sockets is a critical factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery, particularly when preserving alveolar bone and periodontal stability is essential. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous concentrate of growth factors, has gained attention for its potential to enhance bone regeneration and soft-tissue healing. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of PRP application in extraction sockets after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty patients who underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction were divided into two groups according to clinical decision-making in conjunction with patient preference: the PRP group, in which PRP was applied in the extraction socket, and the non-PRP group, which received standard post-extraction care. Clinical parameters, including probing depth and wound closure, and radiographic assessments of alveolar bone level and bone density were recorded at baseline, one month, three months, and six months postoperatively.
resultsThe application of PRP resulted in significant improvements in alveolar bone preservation and periodontal health, with a notable reduction in probing depth compared to the non-PRP group. Although PRP did not show a significant difference in bone density between the groups, a sustained increase over time suggested a positive effect on bone remodeling. PRP also accelerated wound healing, with initial dehiscence observed, but improved closure by day seven, indicating a biphasic influence on tissue repair.
conclusionPRP demonstrated potential benefits in enhancing soft and hard tissue healing after mandibular third molar extraction. Its ability to promote periodontal stability and wound closure suggests its clinical utility for oral surgical procedures. However, larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to establish standardized protocols and confirm their long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.