Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416217›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knowledge and Awareness of Volume Assessment Among Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Assad Bafarag, Abdullah A Balkhair, Ahmed S Qanat, Safinaz Alshiakh, Sadeen Ashour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Assad BafaragIntensive Care Unit, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullah A BalkhairEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Ahmed S QanatEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Safinaz AlshiakhEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Sadeen AshourMedicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid volume measurement in the emergency department and intensive care unit (ICU) is critical for patient care. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of volume assessment among emergency medicine (EM) and ICU physicians in Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among EM and ICU physicians using an online questionnaire. Data were collected on participants' demographics, work-related information, confidence in volume assessment, use of point-of-care ultrasonography, and knowledge and practices of volume assessment.

resultsOf the 114 physicians surveyed, 92 (80.7%) were aged 25-35 years, 65 (57%) were male, 70 (61.4%) were EM physicians, and 68 (59.6%) had fewer than five years of practice. ICU physicians demonstrated significantly higher knowledge that, in mechanically ventilated patients, a distensibility index of >18% indicates fluid responsiveness. In contrast, EM physicians had a higher proportion of correct responses regarding the indications for using Swan-Ganz catheters. The most commonly used method for volume assessment was physical examination (83, 72.8%), and the most frequently used laboratory biomarker was serum lactate (65, 57%). The majority (85, 74.6%) used focused cardiac assessments, including evaluation of the inferior vena cava, for volume assessment. ICU physicians reported significantly higher use of Doppler ultrasound for volume assessment. Only 17 (14.9%) physicians demonstrated a good level of knowledge of volume assessment, with no significant associations found between knowledge level and participants' demographics, work experience, or confidence in volume assessment.

conclusionsA poor understanding of fluid volume assessment was observed among EM and ICU physicians in Saudi Arabia. Training on the principles of volume assessment is needed.

Indexed as

edememergency departmentemergency medicineicuintensive care unitknowledgesaudi arabiavolume

Identifiers

PMID40416217
PMCPMC12103210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.