Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416204›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Knowledge, Attitudes and Socio-Demographic Factors of General Population: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Sindhuja K, Kumari Manjini Jayaram, Molly Mary Thabah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sindhuja KMedical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Kumari Manjini JayaramNursing, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Molly Mary ThabahInternal Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 vaccine offers the most effective means to control the pandemic. Understanding vaccine acceptance is crucial due to high levels of vaccine hesitancy and relatively low vaccination coverage. The aim of this study is to assess the general population's knowledge and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination.

methodsAn explanatory mixed-method approach was used among the general population attending outpatient services at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 369 eligible individuals encountered during the data collection period were included. Their knowledge and attitude regarding COVID-19 vaccination were assessed using a self-structured questionnaire. Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted to explore reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Statistical analyses included mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), and correlation coefficients.

resultsAmong the 369 participants, 226 (61.2%) demonstrated moderate knowledge, while 241 (65.3%) exhibited a favorable attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccine. A positive correlation between knowledge and attitude was observed (r = 0.114, p = 0.029). Participants perceived the vaccine as a means to prevent infection, build immunity, and ensure safety. Hesitancy stemmed from concerns about side effects, age, health issues, fear of needles, lack of awareness, and media influence.

conclusionThe primary factor driving vaccine hesitancy was fear of adverse effects following vaccination. Misinformation and fear are significant barriers to achieving global vaccination goals, requiring targeted interventions to enhance awareness and acceptance.

Indexed as

acceptanceattitudecovid-19knowledgevaccination

Identifiers

PMID40416204
PMCPMC12102516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.