ArticleCureus2025
High-Frequency Ultrasound Evaluation of the Nail Unit: Essential Insights for Clinicians.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Cosmetic Changes in Nails: A Case Series and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHigh-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) has become increasingly prevalent in dermatological clinical settings over the past decade. However, understanding its appropriate indications and significant utility in onychology is not fully exploited. Based on a clinical self-assessment, the study aimed to provide fundamental recommendations regarding the applications, indications, and limitations of HFUS in nail disorders.
methodsA clinical practice assessment survey, comprising 15-item multiple-choice questions focused on nail unit ultrasound, was distributed online to clinicians' members of the Colombian Network of Research and Treatment for Nail Disorders (RITU), during the first quarter of 2024. Participation was voluntary and anonymous; no financial compensation was offered. Aggregated responses were analyzed confidentially.
resultsAround 44 clinicians (86.4% dermatologists and 13.6% radiologists) participated in the study. While most acknowledged the value of HFUS in evaluating nail disorders, knowledge gaps were evident, particularly concerning optimal settings and proficiency maintenance. Despite the widespread use of HFUS, a gap in expertise was observed concerning its application in specific nail pathologies. Although HFUS was the preferred modality for many nail conditions, some concerns about its reliability suggest the need for further training to ensure confident and effective utilization.
conclusionThis study revealed significant knowledge gaps among clinicians regarding the appropriate application of dermatologic ultrasound and other imaging modalities in the evaluation of nail disorders. The findings emphasize the value and specific indications for HFUS in assessing nail pathology, highlighting the need for enhanced training and education in this specialized area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.