Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416194›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Importance of Timing in Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Stephanie Nagy, Atif Hussein, Marc M Kesselman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Circadian rhythms and lung cancer biology and immunotherapy: Emerging opportunities and challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie NagyRheumatology, Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, USA.
Atif HusseinHematology/Oncology, Memorial Cancer Institute, Pembroke Pines, USA.
Marc M KesselmanRheumatology, Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a significant global health concern, with conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation posing considerable risks. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has emerged as a first-line treatment. ICIs enhance the immune system's ability to target and destroy cancer cells by blocking inhibitory proteins on T-cells. The body's circadian clock regulates essential biological functions, including immune response and metabolism, and its disruption can create an immunosuppressive environment conducive to tumor progression. Chronotherapy, which examines the influence of circadian rhythms on treatment efficacy, presents a promising approach to optimizing immunotherapy outcomes. This systematic review explores whether the timing of immunotherapy administration affects key patient outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, and mortality. A total of 21 studies involving 3,682 patients with a mean age of 64.7 were analyzed. Immunotherapy was administered for various cancers, the most common being melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Only ICIs were considered, including monotherapies of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and combination therapies of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or ICIs with additional agents such as atezolizumab with bevacizumab or pembrolizumab with axitinib. Infusion timing varied across studies, with cutoff points for early versus late administration ranging from 11:37 to 16:30, the most common being 16:30. Most studies reported improved OS and PFS in patients receiving earlier infusions, with survival benefits ranging from +2.7 to +26.6 months, with a mean of +15.1 months, and PFS extensions from -0.5 to +28.3 months, with a mean of +8.1 months. Additionally, complete and partial response rates were higher in early infusion groups. However, findings on mortality rates were inconsistent. These results suggest that the timing of immunotherapy administration may significantly impact treatment efficacy, potentially due to interactions with circadian rhythms. Further research is needed to establish standardized guidelines for optimizing infusion timing to enhance patient outcomes.

Indexed as

chronotherapycircadian rhythmimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune systemimmunotherapyinfusion time

Identifiers

PMID40416194
PMCPMC12103892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.