ReviewCureus2025
Steroid-Responsive Intraocular Lens Deposits: A Case-Based Review of Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard surgical procedure for treating cataracts uses intraocular lens (IOL) implants that produce consistent results. Among millions of global cases annually, postoperative complications involving IOL surface deposits occur in less than 1% of patients. The diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in delayed-onset sterile IOL precipitates remain significant because these complications are both uncommon and present atypically. The presented review examines an unusual case where fibrotic gray-white deposits formed on the anterior IOL surface eight months post-surgery without any intraocular inflammatory indicators. Visual acuity declined from the condition until topical corticosteroids provided a dramatic response, which proved the sterile inflammatory origin of the condition. The presented case establishes a base for discussing the pathophysiology, classification, differential diagnosis, and management of IOL surface deposits. The proper diagnosis of IOL surface deposits requires clinicians to differentiate them from genuine lens opacification as well as from both infectious endophthalmitis and toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) because incorrect diagnoses could lead to unnecessary surgical procedures. The review discusses how patients with previous uveitis experience clinical effects and investigates the predictive power of statistical and AI-based models for identifying at-risk cases, as well as future needs for IOL design and postoperative imaging research. The appropriate management of sterile IOL deposits remains essential to protect vision and prevent invasive interventions, particularly for patients who have complex inflammatory backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.