ReviewCureus2025
Optilume® for Urethral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urethral stricture disease treatment presents significant challenges due to high recurrence rates and limited minimally invasive options. This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of the Optilume® drug-coated balloon, which combines mechanical urethral dilation with paclitaxel delivery, as an innovative alternative to traditional treatments. A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies published in the last decade addressing the use of Optilume® for urethral strictures. Keywords included "urethral stricture", "Optilume", and "drug-coated balloon". Data from clinical trials (ROBUST I and III) and real-world studies were synthesized to assess functional and anatomical success, patient outcomes, and safety profiles. Optilume® demonstrated high efficacy in recurrent anterior urethral strictures. ROBUST I showed a 58% functional success rate at five years, with significant improvements in Qmax (5 to 19.9 mL/s) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (25.2 to 7.2). The randomized ROBUST III trial reported superior freedom from reintervention compared to standard treatments (77.8% vs. 23.6% at two years). Real-world studies confirmed these findings across diverse patient populations, including those with complex strictures. Immediate- and short-term postoperative complications were mild and infrequent, with no significant impact on erectile function. Optilume® offers a safe, effective, and minimally invasive solution for urethral stricture management, bridging the gap between endoscopic treatments and urethroplasty. Its advantages include reduced recurrence, shorter recovery times, and preserved sexual function. Future studies should explore its role in treatment-naïve and complex cases to expand its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.