Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416173›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Optilume® for Urethral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review.

Diogo Carmali, Sónia Ramos, Sara Duarte, Eduardo Felício, Guilherme Bernardo, Filipe Gaboleiro, André Pita, Fernando Ferrito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diogo CarmaliUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Sónia RamosUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Sara DuarteUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Eduardo FelícioUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Guilherme BernardoUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Filipe GaboleiroUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
André PitaUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.
Fernando FerritoUrology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Amadora/Sintra (ULS Amadora/Sintra), Lisbon, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urethral stricture disease treatment presents significant challenges due to high recurrence rates and limited minimally invasive options. This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of the Optilume® drug-coated balloon, which combines mechanical urethral dilation with paclitaxel delivery, as an innovative alternative to traditional treatments.  A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies published in the last decade addressing the use of Optilume® for urethral strictures. Keywords included "urethral stricture", "Optilume", and "drug-coated balloon". Data from clinical trials (ROBUST I and III) and real-world studies were synthesized to assess functional and anatomical success, patient outcomes, and safety profiles. Optilume® demonstrated high efficacy in recurrent anterior urethral strictures. ROBUST I showed a 58% functional success rate at five years, with significant improvements in Qmax (5 to 19.9 mL/s) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (25.2 to 7.2). The randomized ROBUST III trial reported superior freedom from reintervention compared to standard treatments (77.8% vs. 23.6% at two years). Real-world studies confirmed these findings across diverse patient populations, including those with complex strictures. Immediate- and short-term postoperative complications were mild and infrequent, with no significant impact on erectile function. Optilume® offers a safe, effective, and minimally invasive solution for urethral stricture management, bridging the gap between endoscopic treatments and urethroplasty. Its advantages include reduced recurrence, shorter recovery times, and preserved sexual function. Future studies should explore its role in treatment-naïve and complex cases to expand its clinical applicability.

Indexed as

drug-coated balloonoptilumepaclitaxel-coated balloonurethral strictureurological devices

Identifiers

PMID40416173
PMCPMC12103936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.