ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
ArcTEX-a novel clinical data enrichment pipeline to support real-world evidence oncology studies.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data stored within electronic health records (EHRs) offer a valuable source of information for real-world evidence (RWE) studies in oncology. However, many key clinical features are only available within unstructured notes. We present ArcTEX, a novel data enrichment pipeline developed to extract oncological features from NHS unstructured clinical notes with high accuracy, even in resource-constrained environments where availability of GPUs might be limited. By design, the predicted outcomes of ArcTEX are free of patient-identifiable information, making this pipeline ideally suited for use in Trust environments. We compare our pipeline to existing discriminative and generative models, demonstrating its superiority over approaches such as Llama3/3.1/3.2 and other BERT based models, with a mean accuracy of 98.67% for several essential clinical features in endometrial and breast cancer. Additionally, we show that as few as 50 annotated training examples are needed to adapt the model to a different oncology area, such as lung cancer, with a different set of priority clinical features, achieving a comparable mean accuracy of 95% on average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.