Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416051›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Walking gait biomechanics in individuals with quadriceps tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kate Pfile, Bennett Prosser, Harris Slone, Michelle McLeod, Chris Gregory, Jennifer Hunnicutt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate PfileDepartment of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, United States.
Bennett ProsserDepartment of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, United States.
Harris SloneOrthopedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Michelle McLeodArthritis Foundation, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Chris GregoryHealth Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Jennifer HunnicuttHunnicutt Writing and Consulting, LLC, Panama City, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Walking is a vital movement, corresponding to physical activity, health, and independent living. Persistent abnormal lower extremity kinetics and kinematics during walking may influence long-term joint health. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common sport-related knee joint injuries resulting in short- and long-term dysfunctional movement patterns. Re-establishing normal gait biomechanical patterns following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a universal long-term rehabilitative goal and indicator of restored function. The use of the quadriceps tendon (QT) graft technique by orthopedic surgeons is increasing and growing evidence suggests it's viable for ACLR. However, no information is available examining walking gait biomechanics in QT-ACLR patients. Our study evaluated three-dimensional hip and knee joint biomechanics during the stance phase of walking gait in patients with QT-ACLR by comparing the ACLR and nonsurgical limbs. We hypothesized hip and knee joint biomechanics will differ between the QT-ACLR and nonsurgical limbs during the stance phase of gait. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 14 patients with unilateral QT-ACLR ∼11 months post-surgery from an orthopedic surgery clinic. Three-dimensional hip and knee kinematics and kinetics and vertical ground reaction force were assessed while participants walked at self-selected speeds. Data were time-normalized from 0%-100% (% stance phase), and ACLR and nonsurgical limbs were compared using curve analyses with 95% confidence intervals. Cohen's d effect sizes identified clinical differences between limbs. Results: The ACLR limb was significantly different from the nonsurgical limb for knee flexion angle (1%-8% and 58%-85%), knee flexion moment (14%-23%), hip flexion moment (60%-67%), knee adduction angle (9%-32%, 92%-100%), knee adduction moment (53%-81%), hip frontal plane angle (0%-100%), hip abduction moment (31%-35% and 71%-76%), knee external rotation angle (0%-100%), knee internal rotation moment (55%-84%), hip transverse plane angle (20%-39% and 88%-100%), and hip internal rotation moment (56%-88%). All significant findings had large effect sizes ( Discussion: Three-dimensional biomechanical gait alterations are present at the knee and hip following QT-ACLR when comparing between limbs. This pattern is consistent with other ACLR graft types. Participants demonstrated gait patterns associated with quadriceps avoidance and reduced proximal forces during the loading response and terminal stance phases. Rehabilitation and functional movement programs should target these deficits.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)gait biomechanicskinematicskineticsvertical ground reaction force

Identifiers

PMID40416051
PMCPMC12100749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.