ArticleJMA journal2025
Assessing the Association of Physician and Specialist Maldistribution with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: Implications for Regulatory Policy.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional disparities in blood pressure control after hypertension treatment initiation in Japan: a real-world data analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Because regional physician maldistribution is considered a potential contributor to disparities in healthcare outcomes, several countries regulate the number of physicians and specialists per region to ameliorate health disparities. However, the association between regional physician maldistribution and specific outcomes, such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at the regional level, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the association between regional physician and specialist maldistribution and OHCA outcomes. Methods: This ecological study used 12 years of longitudinal public open datasets in Japan. We examined the disparity trends of indices of physician and specialist (emergency physicians, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons) distribution using the Gini index. We also examined the physician uneven distribution index, a newly introduced policy index incorporating local demand and supply of medical services. Next, we analyzed the association between these distributions and OHCA-related outcomes (30-day survival rate and 30-day favorable neurological outcome). Results: The overall number of physicians and each specialist steadily increased throughout all regions and the observation period, but the trends in the regional distribution of specialists for each region were not always synchronized with the distribution of overall physicians. Although the disparity within each index has gradually decreased, the disparity of specialists remained high compared with overall physicians. Moreover, regional physician distributions, which showed the lowest level of disparity across regions, were consistently associated with OHCA-related outcomes, whereas the regional disparity of specialists, which consistently exhibited a higher level of disparity, was not associated with the outcomes. Conclusions: Paradoxically, the unevenly distributed specialist distribution indices did not reflect their relevant outcomes, despite their direct involvement in the specific outcomes. Therefore, our findings call into question the validity of policies aimed at correcting the total number of physicians without considering the impact of specialists on healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.