ArticleJMA journal2025
Treatment Resistant Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis: Long-term Follow-up Prospective Study.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many treatments for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) have been proposed; however, most studies showed the results for a single medication and a short duration of treatment. The long-term outcomes of the multidrug therapies remain indeterminate. We conducted a study to investigate the usefulness of multidrug combination therapy for every kind of MASH patient and the differences between treatment-sensitive and treatment-resistant patients. Methods: Fifty-one patients (middle-aged, in their 40s to 60s, metabolic generation) with MASH-determined fibrosis staging were enrolled. Primary treatment (weight control and medication of vitamin E and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i)) was done and then pemafibrate treatment was added. Results: Regarding responses to the step-by-step multidrug therapy, patients with MASH were divided into 3 groups, with use of 3 markers-alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (hepatitis), elasticity value (E value, liver stiffness measurement) (hepatitis/fibrosis), and type IV collagen (fibrosis); group 1: sensitive to primary treatment (n = 35), group 2: resistant to primary treatment and sensitive to pemafibrate treatment (n = 11), and group 3: resistant to both treatments (n = 5).To determine the parameters related to treatment resistance, the baseline levels of parameters Conclusions: The most effective treatment for patients with MASH could not be determined, according to the baseline levels of characteristics; however, weight control and step-by-step multidrug therapies made it possible to stabilize more than 90% of patient conditions and to solve MASH without worsening fibrosis. Since high levels of liver fibrosis-related markers affected the treatment resistance, MASH treatments should be started in an early stage while the levels of each marker are still low; type IV collagen <5.3 ng/mL, E value <13.7 kPa, FIB-4 index <1.89 and MASH fibrosis stage 2 or less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.