ArticleJMA journal2025
Clinical Information and Prognosis of High-risk Luminal Breast Cancer Subjects Eligible for the MonarhE Study.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment of a model to predict the recurrence time of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Luminal breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype. Although its prognosis can be good, this type of breast cancer is characterized by a high incidence of late recurrence. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no publications showing prognostic value regarding the invasive-disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival in this group in clinical practice. Therefore, this study examined the clinical data and prognosis of patients participating in the MonarchE trial. Methods: This study included patients who underwent surgery at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital and whose corresponding prognosis to the Monarch E trial could be followed up. Results: The total number of participants was 152, of whom 104 (68%) were treated with chemotherapy. Seventy-five patients (49%) were postmenopausal. The IDFS after 5 years was 85.0%. Although IDFS did not differ in terms of the menstrual status, premenopausal patients tended to receive a higher proportion of tamoxifen, and there was a greater number of patients treated with chemotherapy. However, neither chemotherapy nor menstrual statuses were found to affect the IDFS incidence. Conclusions: Real clinical data applicable to the MonarchE study were examined. Our univariate analysis revealed that there were no factors affecting IDFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.