ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
The impact of a risk assessment tool on hospital pressure injury prevalence and prevention: a quantitative pre-post evaluation.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semantic Evaluation of Nursing Assessment Scales Translations by ChatGPT 4.0: A Lexicometric Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pressure injuries are preventable adverse events, and their prevalence is established as a quality indicator in healthcare. They are a notable healthcare problem worldwide, as they have a significant impact on the quality of life of affected individuals and are associated with high costs for healthcare systems. The use of an evidence-based risk assessment instrument is, therefore, crucial to enable efficient, effective, and reliable assessments. Objective: The evidence-based pressure injury risk assessment instrument PURPOSE T was widely introduced at a university hospital in 2021, replacing another commonly used assessment tool, the Modified Norton Scale. In this study, we quantified the prevalence of pressure injuries before and after the introduction of PURPOSE T to measure the tool's impact. Settings: At a university hospital in Sweden with about 900 beds. Methods: We adopted a cross-sectional research design and analysed records from point prevalence measurements carried out between September 2018 and 2023. The number of patients included in each point prevalence measurement varied between 474 and 633. Prevalence of all pressure injuries and prescribed prevention interventions over a 5-year period was calculated, compared, and analysed. Results: We observed notable increases in the use of preventive interventions, particularly pressure-reducing chair cushions (+28.6 %) and position adjustments in chairs (+24.2 %). Additionally, we found an average increase of +23.0 % in the prevalence of category I pressure injuries after the introduction of PURPOSE T while observing a decrease in most severe pressure injury categories:35.5 % in category III and -35.3 % in category IV. Conclusions: We found that the introduction of PURPOSE T contributed to the increased use of preventive interventions. This, in turn, was associated with a decrease or modification in the prevalence of pressure injuries, suggesting a positive impact on pressure injury within this facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.