ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Research trends and hotspots of cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Four decades of tinnitus pathology research: a bibliometric analysis of scientific trends, collaborations, and research hotspots.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tinnitus, defined as the perception of sound without an external auditory stimulus, affects millions worldwide, significantly diminishing their quality of life. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most evidence-based treatment for tinnitus management, proven effective in reducing tinnitus-related distress and severity. This study aims to evaluate the current status, emerging trends, and research hotspots in CBT for tinnitus using bibliometric methods, offering valuable insights for future studies in this field. Methods: Publications related to CBT for tinnitus were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from 1985 to 2024. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were performed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix." Results: A total of 209 publications were included in this study. Research on CBT for tinnitus has shown a steady upward trend. Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States have made notable contributions to this field. Linköping University and Karolinska Institute are the leading research institutions. Gerhard Andersson is the most prolific author and ranks first in citation frequency. The most prolific journal is the American Journal of Audiology, while Ear and Hearing is the most frequently co-cited journal. The highly cited references primarily encompass clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that focus on cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions. Recent keyword trends highlight topics such as "mindfulness," "acceptance and commitment therapy," and "internet-based interventions." Addressing psychological comorbidities of tinnitus, including depression and anxiety, is identified as a future research focus. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape for CBT in tinnitus management. Current research emphasizes various CBT modalities to treat psychological comorbidities associated with tinnitus. Future studies should prioritize high-quality research to confirm the long-term efficacy of CBT in tinnitus management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.