ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Differential modulation of the cortical alpha rhythm and activation of distinct neural networks during tactile perception training by learners and non-learners.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A grating orientation task with controlled dome elevation speed and contact force: stimulus conditions and day-to-day reliability.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Resting-state EEG microstate dynamics reflect individual differences in tactile angle discriminability.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The sensitivity and discrimination capacity of sensory systems can be improved by perceptual training. Most individuals demonstrate tactile perceptual learning, but with marked differences in efficiency. Here, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in tactile learning efficiency at the network level. Methods: Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded from 25 neurologically healthy participants at baseline, after one training session (50 trials) on the tactile grating orientation discrimination task (GOT), and again after four sessions of GOT training (200 training trials in total). Participants were then divided into low- and high-learning groups based on the post-training change in GOT threshold (sensitivity). Cortical alpha-band power, which is associated with sensory processing efficiency, was compared between baseline and post-training in low- and high-learning groups. Coherence analysis was also performed between EEG electrode pairs to reveal functional connectivity (FC) networks associated with low and high learning. Results: In the high-learner group, alpha-band power spectral density (PSD) was significantly stronger post-training at the left central-parietal electrodes. In addition, FC in the alpha band was significantly strengthened within left frontal-parietal regions after training. In the low-learner group, post-training alpha-band PSD was significantly strengthened at the bilateral frontal-central electrodes, while FC in the alpha band did not change significantly compared to baseline. Conclusion: These results suggest that individual differences in tactile learning may result from the utilization of distinct neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.