Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415891›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Virtual tactile feedback technology based on microcurrent stimulation: current status, challenges and future prospects.

Qiwei Xiong, Hongbo Yao, Jiyu Wang, Zhenghao Huang, Junhong Luo, Changfu Zhong, Yihuan Lin, Lin Shu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NeuraLoop: a high bandwidth closed-loop human-machine interface.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qiwei Xiong *School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Hongbo Yao *School of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jiyu WangSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenghao HuangSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Junhong LuoSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Changfu ZhongSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yihuan LinSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ShuSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology, virtual reality (VR) technology and metaverse, which highlight personalized experience, have become hot spots in the development of information application industry. Visual, auditory, and tactile systems are the most common sensory systems used by human beings to perceive information about the external environment, facilitated by organs such as the eyes, ears, and skin, making it convenient and natural to interact with the outside world. The integration of virtual tactile feedback technology with audiovisual technology can further enhance the richness of interaction and achieve better immersion experience. Among the many tactile feedback technologies, electrical stimulation tactile feedback stands out due to its performance advantages such as device portability, high refresh frequency and precise control. However, electrical stimulation technology lacks a mature three-dimensional human tissue electrical stimulation conduction model with multipoint stimulation in theoretical research; the variety of virtual tactiles implemented in the research is limited, and there is a gap with real life; and there are fewer audio-visual tactile feedback fusion control models and equipment development problems. Based on these challenges, this paper combs through the latest research progress of microcurrent stimulation-based virtual tactile feedback technology in the field of human-computer interaction. "Microcurrent" here refers to the application of low-intensity electrical currents, specifically under 10 milliamperes, which provide precise and adjustable stimulation for enhancing tactile experiences in virtual and augmented reality applications. This summary outlining the technical characteristics and current research status of this research direction. Finally, the current problems and future development trends in this field are discussed in depth, and how to improve them in order to develop a broader application space is analyzed. By clarifying the potential value of tactile feedback in human-computer interaction, it is hoped to promote the future development of electrically stimulated tactile feedback technology in human-computer interaction, and to help develop a more natural, realistic, efficient and immersive human-computer interaction experience. This study uniquely integrates a systematic analysis of electrotactile perception mechanisms with emerging microcurrent stimulation technologies, providing practical guidelines and a novel reference framework for future research in virtual haptics.

Indexed as

audiovisual-tactile integrationelectrotactile feedbackhuman-computer interactionvirtual realityvirtual tactiles

Identifiers

PMID40415891
PMCPMC12098651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.