ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic and anaerobic capacity in olympic combat sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The effects of high-intensity interval training on physical fitness and physiological responses in taekwondo athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of pre-exercise hyperventilation on repeated high-intensity inclined sprint performance.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
- Effects of Tabata training combined with iron supplementation on proprioceptive acuity in young women with iron deficiency anemia: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity and athletic performance in trained athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effects of a six-week combined tire-squat and explosive-kicking programme on roundhouse-kick performance in highly trained male Muay Thai athletes: a parallel-group controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Muay Thai-specific high-intensity interval training enhances anaerobic power in elite fighters.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Physiological profile of the Norwegian taekwondo (ITF) national team.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to summarize the findings of research comparing the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with active controls (alternative training methods) and passive controls (no exercise intervention) on aerobic and anaerobic performance in male and female athletes engaged in Olympic combat sports. Using the PICOS framework, the study included original research on healthy, trained male and female athletes in Olympic combat sports. These studies compared HIIT interventions (lasting at least 4 weeks) with control groups, focusing on aerobic and anaerobic performance outcomes. Studies that measured other fitness parameters, had non-randomized designs, or involved mixed interventions were excluded. A database search was conducted on February 1, 2025, through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, while the GRADE scale was used to assess the certainty of evidence. After screening, 20 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. The results showed a significant effect of HIIT over control groups for maximal oxygen uptake, with a moderate effect size (ES = 1.007, 95% CI 0.701 to 1.312, p < 0.001). A significant, but small, effect favoring HIIT was also found for peak power output (ES = 0.528, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.954, p = 0.015). Furthermore, the analysis of mean power output showed a moderate significant effect of HIIT over controls (ES = 0.871, 95% CI 0.392 to 1.350, p < 0.001). In conclusion, HIIT, whether performed through running or sport-specific techniques, appears to effectively enhance both aerobic and anaerobic performance in athletes participating in Olympic combat sports. These improvements could contribute to better overall performance, supporting the physical and physiological demands of these sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.