Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415770›Full record

ReviewREC, interventional cardiology

Use of cardiovascular registries in regulatory pathways: perspectives from the EU-MDR Cardiovascular Collaboratory.

Ernest Spitzer, José M de la Torre Hernández, Ingibjörg Jóna Guðmundsdóttir, Eugene McFadden, Claes Held, Claude Hanet, Eric Boersma, Claire B Ren, Victoria Delgado, David Erlinge and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ernest SpitzerCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.
José M de la Torre HernándezEuropean Cardiovascular Research Institute, Rotterdam, Países Bajos European Cardiovascular Research Institute European Cardiovascular Research Institute Rotterdam Países Bajos.
Ingibjörg Jóna GuðmundsdóttirCardiology Department, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Islandia Cardiology Department Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Islandia.
Eugene McFaddenCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.
Claes HeldDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Suecia Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology, Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University Uppsala Suecia.
Claude HanetCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.
Eric BoersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Department of Cardiology Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute Thorax Center Rotterdam Países Bajos.
Claire B RenCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.
Victoria DelgadoCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.
David ErlingeCardiology Department, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Suecia Cardiology Department Lund University Skane University Hospital Lund Suecia.
Armando Pérez de PradoCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Leon, Leon, España Cardiology Department Hospital Universitario de Leon Leon España.
Jeroen J BaxCardiology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Países Bajos Cardiology Department Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Países Bajos.
Jan G P TijssenCardialysis, Rotterdam, Países Bajos Cardialysis Cardialysis Rotterdam Países Bajos.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On May 26, 2021, the European Medical Device Regulation (EU-MDR) entered into effect resulting in a major shift in the requirements for assessment of medical devices in Europe. The EU-MDR Cardiovascular Collaboratory (EU-MCVC) was founded to contribute to the development of faster, more efficient, and more effective pathways for innovation of cardiac medical devices. A registry is an organized system that collects uniform data and evaluates specified outcomes in a population defined by a disease, condition, or exposure. Most registries have been created to improve the quality of care and provide feedback to physicians, hospitals, and health providers. Clinical registries represent an ideal construct for scientific, clinical, and policy-making collaboration. We describe diverse experiences from 5 European countries and address the traditional quality components in clinical trials. Continued collaboration is expected among academics, clinical trialists, patient representatives, regulatory experts, research organizations, registry platforms, regulatory bodies, and industry partners. Data quality is a primary concern and registry leaders need to optimize data quality to become regulatory compliant. A collaborative approach among medical device stakeholders may improve quality of care, reduce costs, and provide faster access to innovative technologies, with the common objective of improving cardiovascular care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical registriesClinical trialsRegulatory science

Identifiers

PMID40415770
PMCPMC12097302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.