ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Electroencephalography-based Assessment of Neural Responses in Typical and Atypical Children during Dental Treatment.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Negligence toward children with special needs frequently has oral health difficulties, which can cause serious problems and impede their access to complete treatment. There are many factors affecting it, considering the behavioral and communication barriers, as well as their high-tendency sensory sensitivity, which makes them more reactive to sounds and sensations associated with dental care. The stress and anxiety associated with dental visits can be compounded for children with special needs, impacting their overall well-being and making future visits more difficult. The aim of this article was to understand and analyze brain patterns in these children compared to normal ones and clinically correlate them for enhanced and empathetic treatment approaches. We considered around 16 participants divided into two groups where noninvasive dental procedures (scaling and fluoride application) were performed while recording brain activity using a 24-channel electroencephalography (EEG) headset. From post analysis, it was observed neurotypical children showed adaptation and decreased anxiety levels after 30% of the procedure, while neurodivergent children required longer adaptation time with minimal adaptation observed which leads us to a conclusion over how implementation of calming interactions like tactile stimulation, better psychological tactics, and comforting the patient to establish trust and tailor intervention according to every patient's history. Clinical significance: The results of this study underline the need for customized dental care strategies for children with special needs and different neurophysiological reactions to dental treatments compared to neurotypical children. The extended adaptation time and low anxiety reduction shown in neurodivergent children suggest that traditional dental procedures might not be able to meet the particular demands of this group. For these children, using soothing methods, including tactile stimulation, psychoeducational strategies, and trust-building techniques, will greatly enhance their dental experience. Including these empathetic techniques in regular dental treatment would help healthcare professionals improve general oral health outcomes, lower anxiety, and increase patient comfort, thereby contributing to thorough and inclusive health care for children with special needs. How to cite this article: Satani A, Bafna Y, Fernandes S,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.