Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415721›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Multidisciplinary monitoring and stakeholder engagement support large carnivore restoration in human-dominated landscape.

Miha Krofel, Urša Fležar, Rok Černe, Lan Hočevar, Marjeta Konec, Aleksandra Majić Skrbinšek, Tomaž Skrbinšek, Seth Wilson, Bernarda Bele, Jaka Črtalič and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translocation effects on regional and local population viability and connectivity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Multidisciplinary monitoring and stakeholder engagement support large carnivore restoration in human-dominated landscape.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Miha KrofelBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-5219
Urša FležarBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Rok ČerneSlovenia Forest Service, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Lan HočevarBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marjeta KonecBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleksandra Majić SkrbinšekBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomaž SkrbinšekBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Seth WilsonBlackfoot Challenge, Ovando, Montana, USA.
Bernarda BeleBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jaka ČrtaličBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomislav GomerčićFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tilen HvalaSlovenia Forest Service, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jakub KubalaTechnical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Pavel KvapilLjubljana ZOO, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Meta MavecBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja Molinari-JobinIUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.
Paolo MolinariIUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.
Elena PazhenkovaBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Hubert PotočnikBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Teodora SinAssociation for the Conservation of Biological Diversity, Focsani, Romania.
Magda SindičićFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ira TopličanecFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Teresa OliveiraBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-5198

Funding

European Commission LIFE16 NAT/SI/000634The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency J1-50013The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P1-0184The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P4-0059World Wildlife Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translocations are central to large carnivore restoration efforts, but inadequate monitoring often inhibits effective conservation decision-making. Extinctions, reintroductions, illegal killings, and high inbreeding levels of the Central European populations of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) typify the carnivore conservation challenges in the Anthropocene. Recently, several conservation efforts were initiated to improve the genetic and demographic status but were met with variable success. Here, we report on successful, stakeholder-engaged translocation efforts across three countries aimed to: (1) reinforce the Dinaric lynx population that was suffering from high inbreeding levels and (2) create a new stepping-stone subpopulation in the neighboring Southeastern Alps to help connect the Dinaric and Alpine populations. To evaluate the success of these efforts, we used multidisciplinary and internationally coordinated monitoring using systematic camera trapping, non-invasive genetic sampling, GPS tracking, recording of reproductive events and interspecific interactions, as well as the simultaneous tracking of the public and stakeholders' support of lynx conservation before, during, and after the translocations. Among the 22 translocated wild-caught Carpathian lynx, 68% successfully integrated into the population and local ecosystems, and at least 59% reproduced. The probability of dispersing from the release areas was three times lower with the soft-release method than with hard-release method. Translocated individuals had substantially lower natural mortality and higher reproductive success, while their ecological impact was similar compared to the lynx from the remnant population. Cooperation with local hunters and protected area managers enabled us to conduct multi-year camera-trapping and non-invasive genetic monitoring across a 12,000-km

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringLynxStakeholder ParticipationAnimalsHumanscamera trappingEurasian lynxinbreedingLynx lynxpublic attitudesreinforcementreintroductionsurvivaltranslocation

Identifiers

PMID40415721
PMCPMC12104966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.