ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
Current State-Of-Play of the EU Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) Field, With an Emphasis on Belgian Human Cell and Tissue Products.
Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Protecting organ donation and transplantation programmes from regulatory uncertainty: an urgent appeal to the European Parliament, Council and Commission.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Cell and Gene Therapy Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Regulatory approach to manipulated organs in Europe: preserving human organs as non-commercial goods.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The late 1980s saw the emergence of experimental therapies based on human cell and tissue products (HCTPs) within academic and hospital settings, several of them wound healing related. In 2008, the European Commission introduced the Regulation on advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), defining many of these HCTPs as ATMPs, and more specifically as somatic cell therapy medicinal products (sCTMPs) or tissue-engineered products (TEPs). In 2013, we predicted that the ATMP regulation would adversely impact Member States' health care systems and would threaten the sustainability of many HCTPs provided by public health institutions. To assess the current ATMP state of play and investigate whether these predictions ultimately came true, we consulted relevant scientific and trade literature and official competent authority reports and surveyed the former Belgian HCTP producers. We found that the ATMP Regulation produced 19 authorised ATMPs, with 16 of them (84.2%) belonging to the gene therapy medicinal product (GTMP) class and only 3 HCTPs (15.8%), 2 TEPs and 1 sCTMP. List prices varied according to the ATMP class, with public health insurances struggling to reimburse ATMPs, especially the exuberantly priced GTMPs. This led to marketing authorization withdrawals, and crowd funding approaches and lotteries to determine who would receive lifesaving treatments. A hospital exemption (HE) scheme was enacted to protect ATMPs not intended for commercial exploitation. Whilst limited financial resources generally hampered HE utilisation by public actors, stringent regulatory policies made it virtually impossible in Belgium, resulting in meaningful HCTPs no longer being available to surgeons and their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.