ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025
The Impact of Whole-Animal Fluid Preservation on the Observed Gut Microbiome of Vertebrates: Implications for the Use of Museum Specimens in Microbiome Research.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The elephant (bird) in the room: unknown mechanisms and unresolved impacts of low DNA yields in avian microbiome research.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- The Impact of Whole-Animal Fluid Preservation on the Observed Gut Microbiome of Vertebrates: Implications for the Use of Museum Specimens in Microbiome Research.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vertebrate gut houses diverse microbial communities that provide insights into their host's ecological and evolutionary histories. Nevertheless, microbiome research has not been distributed equally across host taxonomy, geography and timescales. The millions of fluid-preserved specimens stored in natural history museums worldwide represent a potentially untapped resource for microbiome information. However, it is unknown how fluid preservation and long-term storage change the composition and diversity of the original microbial community across a variety of host taxa. Here, we present the largest study to date aimed at addressing this question. Specifically, we identified an optimal method for extracting DNA from preserved samples using commercially available kits. Next, for 11 host species representing four vertebrate classes, we compared the gut microbiomes between animals dissected freshly and those collected simultaneously but subsequently fixed in formalin and stored in 70% ethanol for 1 year, similar to museum conditions. In a secondary analysis in amphibians, we compared our collected samples with those from decades-old historical museum specimens. We found that while fluid preservation altered the community composition and reduced the diversity of the recovered microbiome inventories, host species identity predominated in shaping the gut microbiome, and differences across species and geographic localities were retained after preservation. Historical specimens had microbiomes that were the most different from fresh specimens, suggesting that over time, changes in the microbiome of populations have occurred, or preservation effects have compounded. Considering these findings, we discuss the potential for use of fluid-preserved museum specimens in future microbiome studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.