ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Mutual information stacking method for prediction of the growth traits in pigs.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction is a crucial technique for phenotype estimation, with the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) being the most widely adopted method. Yet, GBLUP falls short in capturing the intricate nonlinear relationships between genomic data and phenotypes. Given its ability to more effectively capture nonlinear genetic effects, machine learning (ML) has become increasingly appealing in genomic prediction. However, almost GBLUP and ML methods utilize all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data for prediction, ignoring the fact that only a subset of SNPs are effective. This not only consumes computation time but also has poor prediction accuracy. So, this paper proposed a mutual information stacking method (MISM). Firstly, mutual information was introduced to select the SNPs with effect and remove the redundant SNPs. Then, we constructed a stacking model that can capture both linear and nonlinear relationships between SNPs and phenotypes to improve the prediction accuracy. To assess the effectiveness of MISM, we compared its performance on pig growth traits with GBLUP and other ML methods. The statistical analysis results indicated that MISM outperformed other ML models and GBLUP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.