ReviewJournal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
Coronary Vasculitis in Takayasu's: A Case Report and Review of the Literature on Optimal Surgical Intervention.
Review in Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent Coronary Restenosis in Takayasu Arteritis: A Stent-Sparing Strategy.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and characteristics of coronary arteritis within a prospective observational cohort of patients with Takayasu's arteritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a rare, large-vessel vasculitis that typically involves the aorta and its major branches. Patients may experience coronary involvement, most commonly the left main coronary ostia. Patients with coronary artery occlusion often require emergent revascularization; however, there is debate regarding the optimal timing and type of surgical intervention in the setting of TAK. Herein we describe a 32-year-old female presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement and was subsequently diagnosed with TAK. A 32-year-old female presented to the emergency department with chest pressure and dyspnea. Her electrocardiogram findings and troponin elevation were consistent with NSTEMI and she underwent coronary angiography with DES placement. During angiography, aortic insufficiency was noted. Transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed intimal thickening of the aortic root with aortic regurgitation. She was diagnosed with TAK, started on high-dose steroids, and transferred to a tertiary care center for rheumatology consultation. This patient's clinical course raised several questions regarding surgical intervention in TAK. The optimal timing of surgery and preferred approach (endovascular intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) were specifically critiqued. While endovascular intervention (PCI with angioplasty or stent) is typically less invasive than CABG, it may be associated with a higher risk of postsurgical re-stenosis and studies are conflicting regarding the optimal approach. Further research is necessary to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of these interventions, as well as their timing in the overall management plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.