Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415596›Full record

SynthesisESC heart failure2025

Left ventricular decompression in paediatric veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: Reviewing the evidence.

Giacomo Veronese, Paolo Meani, Domenico Sirico, Giovanni Di Salvo, Enrico Ammirati, Alessandro Varrica, Umberto Di Dedda, Paolo Bianchi, Giuseppe Isgrò, Alessandro Giamberti and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Giacomo VeronesePediatric Intensive Care Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-729X
Paolo MeaniDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Domenico SiricoPediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni Di SalvoPediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Enrico AmmiratiDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro VarricaDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Umberto Di DeddaDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Paolo BianchiDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Giuseppe IsgròDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GiambertiDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso AloisioDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Marc DicksteinDivision of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ezio BonanomiPediatric Intensive Care Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Bahaaldin AlsoufiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Ravi R ThiagarajanDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peta M A AlexanderDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
D Michael McMullanCardiac Surgery Unit, Seattle Children Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ryan P BarbaroDivision of Critical Care, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Graeme MacLarenCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Marco RanucciDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Navin K KapurThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Roberto LorussoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) is crucial for neonatal and paediatric patients with severe circulatory collapse but may cause left ventricular (LV) overload, affecting myocardial recovery and causing complications. Evidence on optimal LV decompression strategies in paediatric patients remains limited. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, including articles published between 1993 and 2024 focused on VA ECLS and LV decompression in patients under 18 years of age. The review included 11 retrospective cohorts and registry-based studies (2012-2024), totalling 1222 paediatric patients undergoing decompression. Patient demographics, initial diagnoses and VA ECLS settings were heterogeneous. The prevalence of LV decompression ranged from 46.6% in post-cardiotomy to 10.5% in non-post-cardiotomy peripheral VA ECLS cases. Most patients (57.1%) were supported with peripheral VA ECLS, and the majority (57.4%) underwent percutaneous decompression, whereas surgical approaches predominated in post-cardiotomy central VA ECLS. Balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) was the most frequent technique (50%), followed by surgically placed left atrial cannula (37.4%). Thirteen case series (70 patients) and 28 case reports (28 patients) were also reviewed. Substantial variability in LV decompression strategies exists based on age and clinical scenario. PAS-based techniques were more common in younger patients on peripheral VA ECLS while older children often underwent different strategies. Surgical approaches were preferred in central VA ECLS, particularly in the post-cardiotomy setting. Procedural safety varied by technique. While PAS-based strategies such as BAS generally showed low complication rates, adverse events like arrhythmia, bleeding and cardiac perforation were reported in 7%-9% of cases. Surgical LA cannulation was associated with higher bleeding risk. Impella use was linked to haemolysis (50%) and major bleeding (20%). Comparative data highlight that each technique carries distinct procedural risks and complication profiles. In conclusion, LV decompression during paediatric VA ECLS remains technically challenging and variably adopted. Its benefit appears more consistent in the post-cardiotomy setting, where improved survival and reduced adverse outcomes were observed. Given the lack of standardization, further prospective studies and collaborative registries are essential to guide strategy selection, timing and risk-benefit balance, particularly in such a vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart VentriclesVentricular Dysfunction, LeftChildHumansleft ventricular decompressionpaediatricunloadingveno‐arterial extracorporeal life supportventing

Identifiers

PMID40415596
PMCPMC12287853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.