Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415587›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval-Censored Cause-Specific Joint Model.

Zhenwei Yang, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Eveline A M Heijnsdijk, Lisa F Newcomb, Nicole S Erler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhenwei YangDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-2613
Dimitris RizopoulosDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9397-0900
Eveline A M HeijnsdijkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.
Lisa F NewcombCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicole S ErlerDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-6832

Funding

Prostate cancer Active Surveillance Study (PASS) Cohort: Infrastructure Support for Cancer ResearchU01CA224255 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LIN, DANIEL W. · 2019 to 2023
$6.7M
A pragmatic dietary intervention to improve bladder cancer survivorshipR21CA253910 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI TANG, LI, YEARY, KAREN HYE-CHEON KIM · 2020 to 2020
$440k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA253910NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224255NIH HHS CA253910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS), where biopsies are conducted to detect cancer progression, has been acknowledged as an efficient way to reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer. Most AS cohorts use fixed biopsy schedules for all patients. However, the ideal test frequency remains unknown, and the routine use of such invasive tests burdens the patients. An emerging idea is to generate personalized biopsy schedules based on each patient's progression-specific risk. To achieve that, we propose the interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM), which models the impact of longitudinal biomarkers on cancer progression while considering the competing event of early treatment initiation. The underlying likelihood function incorporates the interval-censoring of cancer progression, the competing risk of treatment, and the uncertainty about whether cancer progression occurred since the last biopsy in patients that are right-censored or experience the competing event. The model can produce patient-specific risk profiles up to a horizon time. If the risk exceeds a certain threshold, a biopsy is conducted. The optimal threshold can be chosen by balancing two indicators of the biopsy schedules: The expected number of biopsies and the expected delay in detection of cancer progression. A simulation study showed that our personalized schedules could considerably reduce the number of biopsies per patient by 41%-52% compared to the fixed schedules, though at the cost of a slightly longer detection delay.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPrecision MedicineProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleWatchful Waitingcompeting riskdynamic predictioninterval censoringjoint modelsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40415587
PMCPMC12104802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.