Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415538›Full record

ReviewReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025

Importance and Control of Colostrum Intake in the Neonate Pig, a Review.

P Langendijk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P LangendijkTrouw Nutrition Innovation, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-363X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the biological significance of colostrum intake for neonatal development in pigs, and discusses the variation in colostrum intake in relation to piglet and sow factors. Lack of or insufficient colostrum intake reduces the odds of survival and compromises immunity, development of the gastrointestinal tract and other organs in neonate piglets. Colostrum intake is linearly related to pre-weaning gain. It is estimated that 10%-30% of piglets consume insufficient colostrum (< 250 g). Colostrum intake is less in piglets from larger litters, in piglets born later in the birth order, in piglets with low birth weight, and in piglets mildly or severely affected by asphyxia. Colostrum yield by sows peaks between parity two and five and then declines again, and is probably related to mammary gland tissue mass and endocrine factors involved in colostrogenesis. Before farrowing, the decline in progesterone facilitates and the increase in prolactin initiates secretion of colostrum, and the changes in both these hormones are related to colostrum yield. Feeding level and fibre may accelerate the decline in progesterone and in that way increase colostrum yield. Earlier during the third trimester of pregnancy, proper management of energy intake and sow body condition is important to optimise mammary gland development. Specific amino acids may be involved in mammary gland development, potentially through IGF-1.

Indexed as

ColostrumAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornFemaleMammary Glands, AnimalPregnancySwinecolostrummammary glandsmortalitypigsow

Identifiers

PMID40415538
PMCPMC12104789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.