SynthesisTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Percutaneous Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Uveal Melanoma: Biology, Prognostication, and Emerging Therapies to Outsmart an Immune-Cold Melanoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe prognosis of patients with uveal melanoma is related to several factors, including local or extraocular extension of the disease. Up to 50% of the patients with initial diagnosis of uveal melanoma develop metastases within few years and the liver represents the main site of metastatic spread. Patients with metastatic disease have a generally poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. In the last decades, the role of interventional radiology has expanded the range of treatment options and different minimally invasive liver-directed therapies were developed for liver metastases from uveal melanoma. The purpose of our systematic review was to analyze and review techniques, outcomes and safety of targeted-liver minimally invasive therapies in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.MethodsAccording to PRISMA criteria, an extensive literature research (including more than 1600 articles) was finalized to collect the main articles on minimally invasive therapies. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 studies were selected for inclusion in the present systematic review (20/26 articles were retrospective studies, 6/26 articles were prospective studies). We collected data on 955 patients underwent the following procedures: radioembolization, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, transarterial immunoembolization, percutaneous hepatic perfusion and thermal therapies.ResultsAmong procedures analyzed, the median overall survival was 16 months, the median progression-free survival was 8.2 months, while the median overall response rate was 39%. Post-procedure haematologic and gastrointestinal adverse events were predominant after percutaneous hepatic procedures.ConclusionTo date, different minimally invasive therapies are available for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. Studies on percutaneous liver-directed therapies have demonstrated improvement in outcomes, prolonging overall survival and progression-free survival, and with an acceptable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.