ReviewJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2025
Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.
Review in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conserved and diverged embryonic expression patterns of panarthropod NK-Cluster genes and new evidence for CRE-shuffling.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene and genome duplications are widely observed across various organisms, including plants, yeasts, and animals. Numerous studies link gene duplications to the emergence of novel phenotypes, supporting the hypothesis that duplication events are advantageous for adaptive evolution. Whole-genome duplications (WGD) are especially prevalent in plants and have also occurred ancestrally in vertebrates. However, large-scale duplication events in other animal groups remain understudied, partly due to limited genomic resources. Arthropods, particularly insects, represent one of the most diverse animal clades in terms of both species and phenotypic diversity. With increasing availability of chromosome-level genomes, large-scale duplications appear to be rare in insects but are more frequent in chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, and horseshoe crabs). This makes chelicerates an intriguing group for comparing the mechanisms, fates, and evolutionary impacts of large-scale duplications with those seen in plants and vertebrates. In this review, we synthesize and discuss current research on WGD in spiders and discuss different scenarios for genes following gene duplication events (conservation, nonfunctionalization, subfunctionalization, specialization, drift, neofunctionalization) in the context of experimental studies. We hypothesize if there might be common trajectories after duplication and how these could be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.