Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415410›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2025

Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.

Chetan Munegowda, Matthias Pechmann, Nikola-Michael Prpic-Schäper, Natascha Turetzek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chetan MunegowdaAG Zoologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Institut für Allgemeine Zoologie und Entwicklungsbiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Carl-Vogt-Haus, Gießen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3790-2185
Matthias PechmannInstitute for Zoology, Department of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-906X
Nikola-Michael Prpic-SchäperAG Zoologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Institut für Allgemeine Zoologie und Entwicklungsbiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Carl-Vogt-Haus, Gießen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-2175
Natascha TuretzekEvolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Biocenter, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-2177

Funding

The authors received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)-project number 503325252, part of the Priority Programme SPP 2349: Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovations (GEvol, project number 458908270).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene and genome duplications are widely observed across various organisms, including plants, yeasts, and animals. Numerous studies link gene duplications to the emergence of novel phenotypes, supporting the hypothesis that duplication events are advantageous for adaptive evolution. Whole-genome duplications (WGD) are especially prevalent in plants and have also occurred ancestrally in vertebrates. However, large-scale duplication events in other animal groups remain understudied, partly due to limited genomic resources. Arthropods, particularly insects, represent one of the most diverse animal clades in terms of both species and phenotypic diversity. With increasing availability of chromosome-level genomes, large-scale duplications appear to be rare in insects but are more frequent in chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, and horseshoe crabs). This makes chelicerates an intriguing group for comparing the mechanisms, fates, and evolutionary impacts of large-scale duplications with those seen in plants and vertebrates. In this review, we synthesize and discuss current research on WGD in spiders and discuss different scenarios for genes following gene duplication events (conservation, nonfunctionalization, subfunctionalization, specialization, drift, neofunctionalization) in the context of experimental studies. We hypothesize if there might be common trajectories after duplication and how these could be tested.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenomeSpidersAnimalsEvolution, Molecularneofunctionalizationspidersusurpationwhole genome duplication (WGD)

Identifiers

PMID40415410
PMCPMC12576392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.