ReviewNeurointervention2025
Methodological Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.
Review in Neurointervention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Picture Archiving and Communication System-Integrated Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Patient and physician perspectives on large language model generated responses about brain aneurysm.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Aneurysm Volumetry: The Unmet Need for Validation.Neurointervention · 2026Article
- Commercial AI platforms improve reproducibility but fail to meet clinical precision thresholds for intracranial aneurysm measurement: implications for serial surveillance.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Anatomically-guided Masked Autoencoder with Domain-Adaptive Prompting (AMAP) for multimodal cerebral aneurysm detection and segmentation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting intracranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). However, the clinical translation of these technologies remains limited due to methodological limitations and concerns about generalizability. This scoping review comprehensively evaluates 36 studies that applied deep learning to intracranial aneurysm detection on CTA or MRA, focusing on study design, validation strategies, reporting practices, and reference standards. Key findings include inconsistent handling of ruptured and previously treated aneurysms, underreporting of coexisting brain or vascular abnormalities, limited use of external validation, and an almost complete absence of prospective study designs. Only a minority of studies employed diagnostic cohorts that reflect real-world aneurysm prevalence, and few reported all essential performance metrics, such as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and false positives per case. These limitations suggest that current studies remain at the stage of technical validation, with high risks of bias and limited clinical applicability. To facilitate real-world implementation, future research must adopt more rigorous designs, representative and diverse validation cohorts, standardized reporting practices, and greater attention to human-AI interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.