ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Deep Learning for Automated Prediction of Sphenoid Sinus Pneumatization in Computed Tomography
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sphenoid sinus pneumatization types, extensions and adjacent neurovascular structures: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sphenoid sinus is an important access point for trans-sphenoidal surgeries, but variations in its pneumatization may complicate surgical safety. Deep learning can be used to identify these anatomical variations.
methodsWe developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for the automated prediction of sphenoid sinus pneumatization patterns in computed tomography (CT) scans. This model was tested on mid-sagittal CT images. Two radiologists labeled all CT images into four pneumatization patterns: Conchal (type I), presellar (type II), sellar (type III), and postsellar (type IV). We then augmented the training set to address the limited size and imbalanced nature of the data.
resultsThe initial dataset included 249 CT images, divided into training (n = 174) and test (n = 75) datasets. The training dataset was augmented to 378 images. Following augmentation, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the model improved from 76.71% to 84%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84, indicating very good diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis showed excellent results for type IV, with the highest AUC of 0.93, perfect sensitivity (100%), and an F1-score of 0.94. The model also performed robustly for type I, achieving an accuracy of 97.33% and high specificity (99%). These metrics highlight the model's potential for reliable clinical application.
conclusionThe proposed CNN model demonstrates very good diagnostic accuracy in identifying various sphenoid sinus pneumatization patterns, particularly excelling in type IV, which is crucial for endoscopic sinus surgery due to its higher risk of surgical complications. By assisting radiologists and surgeons, this model enhances the safety of transsphenoidal surgery, highlighting its value, novelty, and applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.