ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2025
Trends in 4D Printed Shape Memory Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D printing as an innovative tool in personalized management of complex airway diseases: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Intelligent therapeutic robotic-assisted surgery as the next frontier of precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Corneal Epithelial Tissue Engineering Strategy Based on Cell Viability Optimization: A Review and Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shape memory polymers and stimuli-sensitive materials are utilised in 4D printing to develop tissue structures that are dynamic and flexible. The capability of these polymers to react to numerous stimuli like pH, light, and temperature increases the adaptability and usefulness of tissue engineering applications. The article aims at the application of smart SMPs in 4D printing for tissue engineering, emphasising their response to diverse physical and chemical stimuli. The current review article compiled data from previously reported studies by searching in commonly used electronic databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, etc. The authors have preferably considered the data from the last 10 years for inclusion. The study addresses developments in smart shape memory polymers and their transformational influence on biological applications. The integrated approach of 4D printing and shape memory biomaterials can potentially improve tissue engineering applications. Researchers can enhance tissue regeneration by utilising the responsive properties of these materials to physiological signals. This allows for the design of dynamic scaffolds that closely imitate the behaviour of real tissue, resulting in more efficient tissue regeneration. 4D-printed shape memory biomaterials have the potential to enhance tissue engineering via the use of dynamic and adaptable scaffolds. However, some obstacles must be overcome, such as material limitations and the capacity to scale up production, to achieve successful clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40415301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.