ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Robust CAR T-cell expansion and superior outcomes in DLBCL patients in complete response at infusion.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust CAR T-cell expansion and superior outcomes in DLBCL patients in complete response at infusion.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Historically, the presence of measurable disease has been considered essential to stimulate CAR T-cell expansion and persistence. However, the kinetics of CAR T cells in patients achieving complete response (CR) before infusion remain poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and CAR T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients stratified by pre-infusion disease status. In this retrospective analysis of 87 patients treated at a single institution, 23 (26.4%) were in CR and 64 (73.6%) were in non-CR prior to CAR T-cell infusion. Patients in CR exhibited significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to non-CR patients. Peripheral blood CAR T-cell kinetics, including the proportion and absolute counts of CAR T cells, CD4+ CAR T cells and CD8+ CART cells, showed no significant differences between CR and non-CR groups. These findings were consistent across different CAR T-cell products, whether 4-1BB- or CD28-based. Moreover, an analysis of patients achieving complete metabolic response (CMR) by PET-CT confirmed comparable CAR T-cell expansion and persistence in both CMR and non-CMR patients. Our findings demonstrate that CAR T-cell therapy achieves robust expansion and favourable survival outcomes in CR patients, even in the absence of measurable disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.