ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Predictive clinical characteristics for adverse pathological outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer during biopsy.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: Insights into genetic, RNA and metabolic markers (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdverse pathological features in prostate cancer (PCa) are characteristics found in biopsy tissue that indicate a more aggressive or advanced disease. This study aims to develop a biopsy-based model for assessing the risk of adverse PCa and to evaluate its performance against the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator (RC) 3/4 and PSA models.
methodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of ≤ 50 ng/mL underwent prostate biopsies. The patients' age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcomes were documented. Patients were classified into categories: no cancer, very low-risk, low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. We investigated the relationship between our model and adverse PCa using a binary Generalized Linear Model (GLM). We evaluated the model's discriminatory ability using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared its predictive performance with the adverse model in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
resultsOut of 824 patients, PCa was diagnosed in 320 (38.8%) men, and 203 (24.6%) had unfavorable PCa. The GLM demonstrated improved performance metrics, with an AUC of 0.766, compared to 0.639 for the RC 3/4 model and 0.655 for the PSA model. The GLM showed a good fit and provided a greater net benefit.
conclusionThe study identified clinical predictors of adverse PCa during biopsy, demonstrating moderate discrimination and clinical utility. Further large multicenter studies are required for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40415146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.